Behavior modification
Sometimes we make our lives more difficult as fundraisers through unintended consequences of how we train donors to interact with our organization or others.
Sometimes we make our lives more difficult as fundraisers through unintended consequences of how we train donors to interact with our organization or others.
Last month, we dove into self-interested donations and the harm it does to the donor. Perhaps you are asking, "Now, what? How should I thank donors???" First, we need to re-frame the question to: How should I thank the gift from the donor? This shift turns the question from praising the donor to praising the action; from the person to the performance. Performance-based praise has been shown to be a more effective reinforcer. This research started in the educational psychology field with children and has quickly expanded into the business world. The difference, in summary, is that person-praise has a "fixed mindset" of innate talent and personality (I am a giver) while performance-praise has a "growth mindset" for maturing as a person (I can become more generous). Wait! Hold the fort! What about being "donor-centered?" Agreed. When I was preparing for my Certified Fundraising Executive (CFRE) exam, I borrowed Penelope Burk's book, Donor-Centered Fundraising, from a colleague. In actually reading this book and the research, I had a moment of "what I thought I knew, but was wrong about." From the beginning of my fundraising career, I had heard of this concept, attended trainings and applied with I thought I learned; that…
The more benefits and recognition we heap on the donor, the more we reduce the pure delight of being generous and doing good.
Let me guess... your To-Do list probably has "write thank you notes" on it. And, it is probably not an item you get to check off as done because tomorrow or the next day brings more donations and more thank you notes. How do we make donor stewardship less rote?